L'impact de la canicule sur la mobilité en Europe : comment garder une longueur d'avance ?

The buzz around self-driving cars isn’t as loud as it used to be, but it remains a constant noise in fleet managers’ ears. The United Kingdom government has moved autonomous vehicle integration pilot plans to 2026, renewing interest in the technology. Will decision-makers ignore the noise or embrace early adoption?Autonomous vehicle integration involves embedding self-driving technologies like artificial intelligence, light detection and ranging (LiDAR), and high-definition cameras into commercial fleets. On a broader scale, it entails introducing self-driving cars into existing public transportation systems.Driver assistance systems include collision avoidance, automatic speed adjustment, lane-centring, adaptive cruise control and intelligent ride-hailing. Partial and conditional automation leverage more advanced technologies to enable hands-free operation under certain circumstances.Level 4 and 5 automation are top priorities for automakers but challenging to implement in practice because engineers must account for countless edge cases. Even with advanced AI, perfecting parking and preventing collisions can be difficult. What if the pavement markings are barely visible or a child runs into the road? Adoption hinges on the car’s reaction.According to the Centre for Connected & Autonomous Vehicles, transport secretary Heidi Alexander confirmed the U.K. government will accelerate self-driving commercial pilot plans and aim for Spring 2026. The move could and add £42 billion to the U.K. economy by 2035.The country’s new automated vehicle legislation is among the most robust worldwide, laying the groundwork for widespread commercial adoption. Technological maturity is the only remaining hurdle.In an interview with McKinsey & Company, Sascha Meyer — the CEO of German automotive technology company MOIA — said predicting autonomous vehicle integration timelines has been challenging. In 2016, her enterprise MOIA throughout Europe by 2021.Since then, Meyer has realised adoption entails designing an entire ecosystem, not just driving functions. The new timeline sees self-driving cars in European cities by 2030 at the earliest. The engineers at MOIA are designing the prototype to exceed mandated redundancies. This way, they will be ready to operate commercially once the relevant legislation passes.Delivery, taxi, utility, and commercial fleets are seeing an uptick in driver assistance systems and intelligent automation. However, the penetration rate remains relatively low, especially considering how long the technology has existed. What are their plans for autonomy?Increased efficiency is among the main reasons fleet managers are embracing automation. Unlike humans, driverless vans can operate around the clock. With telematics systems, they can optimise driving and minimise idle time to improve fuel efficiency and expedite trips.AI is immune to human error, eliminating harsh braking and distracted driving. It cannot become fatigued and does not have blind spots. These improvements could help reduce road collisions and car accidents, which can mitigate costly workers’ compensation claims and potentially lower insurance costs.Cost savings are another contributing factor. At Level 4 and 5, owners can optimise labour expenses and compensate for driver shortages. Moreover, electric driverless cars with vehicle-to-grid capacity can over 30 years, helping offset the upfront investment.Aside from waiting for driverless technology to mature, fleet owners are delaying adoption due to high upfront costs. Embedding LiDAR, AI and telematics into every truck is expensive. Buying new instead of retrofitting is equally pricey. Even if cost savings could be found, technology is moving quickly — their investment may quickly become outdated.Safety is another concern. Photo-eye sensors garage doors. They stop the door from closing on objects, cars or people, and are used throughout the industry in car washes and automotive assembly lines. While some automakers utilise camera-only systems, engineers have had to pioneer new solutions. Today, many use LiDAR, global navigation satellite systems and ultrasonic sensors.However, even the most advanced systems are fallible. It is not enough to make automated cars perform as well as people — they must succeed where human drivers fail.Sensors have existed for years, but engineers have not perfected them yet. They may fail in edge cases or unfamiliar scenarios. Level 3 cars only work on premapped, divided highways in clear weather. Given that the U.K. in 2021, they may be too unreliable for adoption at scale.Autonomous vehicle integration may be moving slowly, but it is on track to reach its destination within the next decade. According to Goldman Sachs research, sold worldwide could be Level 3 vehicles by 2030. It forecasts that Level 2 — those requiring driver supervision — will increase from 20% of sales in 2025 to 30% in 2027.Managers should consider the scope and cost of autonomous fleet integration to determine whether early adoption is right for them. It will likely result in long-term savings, but waiting may be more rewarding because it allows time for technological advancement. If the cost-benefit analysis is unconvincing, they should consider incrementally upgrading as cars fail.Those who proceed with adoption must develop operation, storage, security and upgrades policies. These rules should vary depending on the automation level. For instance, drivers of Level 3 lorries should be required to pay full attention to the road to take control if necessary.Educating employees on their role is essential for successful implementation. Volkswagen Financial Services research found consider themselves better drivers than autonomous vehicles, so they are unlikely to overestimate the driverless system’s capabilities. However, they should still receive explicit training on best practices and habits to avoid.Self-driving machines are hard at work in ports and warehouses across Europe. Automating highway vehicles is more challenging because they are not on a fixed track. Also, they must account for variables like weather and other motorists. Geofencing, telematics and AI are accelerating adoption by making the unpredictable predictable. At the very least, these solutions enhance response times and mitigate human error, demonstrating that these previously unproven technologies are just as capable as human motorists.For now, full automation that eliminates the need for human attention remains theoretical. However, hands-free driving is a reality, and driverless systems could soon become standard issue in commercial fleets. As automakers perfect driving functions, fleet owners should prioritise route mapping, driver management and maintenance scheduling.Discover more from .

The growth of electric charging stations across Europe for HGVs has led to a transitional period across the continent's vast road networks. For many fleet operators and drivers, classic diesel-fuelled HGVs are still the transport of choice. However, the shift to electric HGVs is looming, as the industry continues to evolve.To assess the feasibility of switching from diesel to electric, SNAP has authored research into the costs of recharging HGVs vs refuelling them across various European freight routes. We calculated the electricity versus diesel savings in euros per 100 km across .We found that Iceland led the way with an average cost saving of , with fellow Nordic countries Norway and Finland offering the second and third highest cost savings respectively. At the other end of the scale, Croatia offered the least amount of cost savings with , followed by Cyprus and Moldova.In this article, we uncover the cost savings per European country and analyses some of the cost savings per European country and analyses some of the external factors that may be influencing these savings. We also dive into what the future of eHGVs in Europe may look like as well as how eHGVs can help fleet operators and drivers save money, particularly with .Our research found that for every European country investigated, using an eHGV with electric charging saved money when compared to using a traditional HGV with fuel. The primary difference was just how much the cost savings varied. For example, the price for electricity in the most expensive country, (41 euros higher) than the least expensive country, Croatia.We found that on average, a driver with an electric HGV will save when compared with a diesel HGV driver. This translates to an estimated a year for long-haul electric HGV drivers and .To compile our data, we looked at 35 European countries and compared the energy or fuel cost per 100 km for two types of heavy goods vehicles (HGVs). These were a standard diesel HGV, assuming fuel consumption of 35 litres per 100 km at each country's average retail diesel price, and an electric HGV, assuming electricity use of 108 kWh per 100 km based on the average non-household electricity rate. VAT and recoverable taxes were excluded from these calculations. The comparison reflects direct “at-the-pump” or “at-the-plug” costs only, without accounting for factors such as fleet size, negotiated energy contracts, or future changes in fuel and electricity prices.When researching the pricing for diesel and electricity, a number of sources were drawn from, including , and . It is worth noting that some of these sources refer to ‘Great Britain’ while others refer to the ‘UK’. For the purposes of this research, both terms were treated interchangeably., , and are currently the countries where the most can be saved by converting to an electric HGV.This is largely due to these countries ranking among the most expensive in Europe for diesel. Iceland ranks as the most expensive country in Europe for diesel (€2.07 per litre). This steep cost largely comes from its geographical isolation compared with the rest of Europe, leaving the cost of importing diesel much higher than that of other European nations. Iceland, like Norway and Finland, is also known for its high tax rate, which also contributes to its high fuel cost. and also make up the top two countries in the world for electric cars on the road as a share of passenger cars on the road. As a result, both countries have invested significantly in electric charging infrastructure.Iceland’s small size and main ring road also make it easier to install electric charging stations at regular intervals for electric HGV drivers. The same reasoning can be partly used for other countries with smaller networks that have a high rate of cost savings, including Albania, Serbia, and Belgium — although it should be noted that all three also have some of the most expensive diesel prices in Europe, which contributes to the difference in cost savings.The chart below shows the top 10 countries that have the largest cost savings when using an electric HGV:Matthew Bellamy Croatia , Cyprus , and Moldova are currently the three countries with the lowest cost savings in Europe.Croatia has the in the EU after Poland. This is partly because of Croatia's poor EV charging infrastructure, such as charging stations that require ringing customer service or use multiple different apps to start the charging process, poor directions for charging stations outside major highways, and potentially high wait times during peak tourist season. Additionally, Croatia lacks ultra-high-speed charging stations (180 kW and above), which can prove a problem for electric HGVs that require more power than the average EV.Both Cyprus and Moldova have internal geopolitical issues that make infrastructure planning for EV charging (as well as national planning in general) difficult. For Cyprus, the northern half of the island — including half of its capital, Nicosia — has been -backed Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus since 1974. For Moldova, the eastern province of Transnistria acts as a de facto state with its own government. This means that both countries are unable to implement EV infrastructure in a consistent way across the territory they consider their own.The issues in Cyprus are also compounded by high electricity costs, while Moldova has the fifth cheapest diesel prices in Europe. Moldova is also the , making investment in EV infrastructure a challenge. All these factors contribute to an overall low cost saving for electric HGVs.Poland is also low on the list with a cost saving of . Despite its impressive economic growth and growing investment in EV charging infrastructure, its large size means that coverage is still an issue in certain areas of the country — although this looks likely to .Countries such as Spain , Romania , and Ireland occupy the middle of the road when it comes to cost saving for electric HGVs. This is likely due to these countries have growing EV charging infrastructure, and mid-priced electricity and diesel costs.The chart below shows the top 10 countries that have the lowest cost savings when using an electric HGV:The , which places it 11th overall for cost savings from recharging per 100 km. This is largely due to how expensive UK fuel prices are, with . Although the savings from high diesel costs certainly contribute to the UK’s high eHGV costs savings, it would likely be far higher if the electricity in the UK were not also amongst the in Europe.The UK is also expecting improvements to its EV charging infrastructure. The UK motorway service company, Moto is actively planning to build . These superhubs can better accommodate EV charging for eHGVs more efficiently than a standard EV charger. There are currently . With like BP Pulse and Aegis Energy also looking to invest, it looks likely that the UK will have a much-improved HGV charging network in the near future.There are several factors currently impacting HGV electrification, including a lack of charging infrastructure, long charge times, the high initial costs of eHGV conversion, and their limited range. Additionally, the comparatively low cost and accessibility of diesel fuel and vehicles make traditional HGVs an attractive option for However, all these impacts can vary depending on the country of operation. For example, if your fleet only runs domestically in a country such as Norway or Iceland, then it is likely to be less affected than a fleet operating across Europe or in regions with poorer eHGV infrastructure, such as the Balkans.The main obstacle to HGV electrification is insufficient eHGV charging infrastructure. This is because eHGVs require megawatt-scale charging, which most existing EV charging points for passenger vehicles (standard electric cars and vans) do not support.There are many countries in Europe that severely lack such infrastructure, especially on major freight routes and at truck stops. These tend to be poorer states in southern and eastern Europe such as Moldova, Georgia, and Bulgaria. It is no coincidence that these states rank in the bottom 10 for eHGV cost savings.It can also be the case that eHGV charging stations do exist, but they are in areas that simply can’t accommodate multiple eHGVs charging overnight due to a weak local power grid. This is often a problem in more rural and remote parts of Europe.Although many European countries are planning to improve eHGV infrastructure, it is still a time-consuming and expensive process, with numerous bureaucratic, logistical, and technical obstacles to overcome — not to mention the surrounding infrastructure upgrades, such as local grid connections, that will also be needed.Electric HGVs take far longer to charge than standard EVs. This means that charging must often take place overnight. Even if rapid eHGV chargers can be acquired, the process still takes at , rather than a few minutes, as is the case with petrol vehicles.This long charging time can have a knock-on effect for fleet operators in terms of turnaround times. In an industry with tight delivery schedules and deadlines, this can be potentially detrimental to business performance.Electric HGVs are also constricted by their relatively limited range compared to the mileage afforded by traditional HGVs. According to Safety Shield, a typical electric HGV has a range of around on a single charge (roughly the distance from London to Rotterdam). A typical diesel-powered HGV, however, can travel up to on a single tank of fuel (roughly the distance from London to Warsaw).Electric HGV mileage can also be more affected by external factors such as load, , and terrain. This can lead to range anxiety for drivers, who may conduct more frequent charges to ensure they have enough power to reach their destination. This, in turn, can lead to delivery delays, especially when driving through countries with poor eHGV charging infrastructure.All of this makes it vital for fleet operators planning journeys for their eHGVs. It should be noted that battery technology is constantly evolving, and capacity — and therefore mileage — will continue to improve in the near future.The initial cost of an eHGV is high (typically between , compared to between £80,000-£100,000 for a diesel HGV) which can potentially deter independent drivers and smaller fleet operators from owing one. This is largely due to the expense of the battery technology involved. This means that it will be costly to purchase a new electric HGV outright as the technology inside is more expensive than that of a diesel HGV.High initial eHGV purchasing costs also means that fleet operators in countries with cheaper electricity rates for eHGV charging such as Norway, Sweden, or Finland are more likely to convert since they will recoup their investment quicker than those in countries with expensive electricity, such as Ireland and Croatia.Electricity prices can also fluctuate in relation to various events. For example, over the past five years, electricity prices have fluctuated in response to economies opening up after the COVID-19 pandemic and then Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 (the latter in particular had major effects on European energy supply). As a result, there was a spike in electricity prices of almost 30%, from for the average EU capital in the post-invasion period. With the EU average now, however, , it appears that electric charging for HGVs is set to continue its ascendency.Across Europe, the average cost of running an electric HGV over 100 km is €20.51 — significantly cheaper than the €51.10 it costs for a diesel HGV over the same distance.As efficiency improves and battery technology becomes more widespread and less expensive to produce, eHGVs will also become more affordable to acquire.Diesel fuel still plays a dominant role in the HGV industry. This is because diesel infrastructure has been well established in Europe for decades, especially in comparison to electric chargers for HGVs. Diesel's compatibility with , and its relatively cheapness also keep it popular with truck fleet managers.As with electricity, however, the value of diesel fluctuates across the continent. This is why it can appear more advantageous to stick with diesel HGVs in countries like Moldova, Georgia, and Malta, where diesel remains cheap. Conversely, for nations like Iceland and the Netherlands, where diesel is relatively expensive, there is greater incentive to switch to an electric HGV.A country with low-cost fuel may also be more hesitant to invest heavily in eHGV infrastructure for fear of alienating traditional HGV fleets, who may choose alternative routes as a result.Electric HGVs are the long-term future of road haulage. Not only are they cheaper to run over time, but with new infrastructure being invested in and built at a strong rate, they will also become much more financially and strategically viable.Beyond the economic benefits, electric HGVs are also important for their contribution to environmental goals such as Net Zero. With traditional HGVs being large-scale polluters, the by eHGVs will be felt in cleaner air across Europe.The look set to impact electric HGVs in the future:: will evolve to better accommodate eHGVs alongside other smart technological advancements. These truck parks may include up-to-date ultra-fast charging stations, diagnostic machines, battery swap stations, and automated cleaning services, among other features. : Low Emission Zones (LEZs) already exist in a number of cities (e.g. Paris, Berlin, and Milan) with more European cities likely to follow suit with more stringent. Fleet operators may opt for eHGVs to meet EU regulations or retrofit their HGVs with cleaner technologies, like . : has already had a across road haulage — with applications in route optimisation, predictive maintenance, and . Electric vehicles will likely incorporate AI to help drive sustainability in the haulage industry over the coming decades. : The shift to eHGVs is part of a wider global push toward sustainable living. The effects of extreme weather, including heatwaves and floods across Europe, show no sign of slowing due to climate change. Moving to electric HGVs is one way the world is reducing its dependence on fossil fuels. : During the transition to cleaner fuel sources, there will be a variety of HGV types on the road throughout the 2030s. Many will be older diesel models, some will be electric, and others will be powered by alternative fuels such as biofuel made from renewable biomass sources.Electric HGVs are the future, of that there is little doubt. The economic and environmental benefits will see more fleet operators and drivers switch to eHGVs in the coming years. How long this transitional period lasts will depend on how quickly Europe can develop its eHGV charging infrastructure.There are currently large swathes of the continent where eHGVs lack viability and require extensive route optimisation due to their shorter range. Additionally, the upfront costs involved can deter independent drivers and smaller fleet operators.The technology and infrastructure will continue to improve, and there are already services, like those found on the SNAP portal, designed to make managing eHGV fleets and related costs as simple as possible. From route optimisation and fleet management to maps for parking and truck washes, SNAP makes trucking simple.

In June, plans to ease HGV traffic in favour of rail freight at the 'cloud factory' (West Fraser wood panel manufacturing) near Inverness were given the green light. The expansion will remove from the A96 each year. We examine the impact this will have on the haulage industry. The plans will come in two phases, both of which will expand rail freight services to create a sustainable operational future. to be completed by next year and will see 20,000 HGVs removed from the roads yearly. aims to remove 40,000 HGVs, the equivalent of 60% of their current HGV traffic each year. This phase will be completed by 2028. Further expansion of phase two will allow other companies around Inverness to use their rail facilities for freight.Due to the rail freight expansion, the industry will no doubt see a reduction in road haulage to that area. The changes equate to roughly , alleviating the pressure on the A96.Although haulage firms will see a decline in demand for long-distance timber trucking, they will see a rise in shorter, last-mile HGV movements such as, collecting timber to transport to the railyard. The sector may also see growth in rail logistics roles, such as coordinating loading between trucks and trains. In 2022, were transported by HGVs within the UK, involving approximately 156 million HGV journeys. The mobility sector has long been one of the largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union. In 2022, it emitted of Europe's transport GHG emissions. Despite this high figure, the industry has shown slow progress in reducing its emissions. The shift to rail at the 'Cloud Factory' is expected to cut around . A small albeit important step in the right direction in aiding the sector's transition to net zero by 2050. Although many may see this change as a negative, the haulage industry could still benefit. Goods will still need to be transported from the road to the rail network this poses a new opportunity for hauliers to offer this specialist service. In the area, transport companies could handle inbound timber deliveries and intermodal freight.West Fraser themselves have estimated that the change will likely see an increase in HGVs to and from the site.As the industry moves toward more rail integration, haulage firms must adapt quickly and invest more. • Fleets will transition from long-haul logging trucks to specialised short-haul journeys. • Investment in specialised equipment may be essential for loading containers. • Partnerships with rail operators and railyard managers could have a positive impact on haulage companies. SNAP provides parking across the UK and Europe. Use the or download to find your space today.