Susie Jones
Hírek és frissítések • 3 min olvasni

Autonóm teherautók: Az előttünk álló út kibogozása

Létrehozva: 16. 05. 2025

Frissítve: 23. 05. 2025

Autonóm teherautók - egyesek számára ijesztő elképzelés, de úgy tűnik, hogy a logisztikai ipar jövője. Ahogy a technológia fejlődik az ágazaton belül, a részben vagy teljesen autonóm járművekkel történő áruszállítás lehetősége is nagy. Az Egyesült Királyság kormánya szerint ez akár már 2026-ban bekövetkezhet, mivel 2024 májusában törvénybe iktatták az automatizált járművekről szóló törvényt.

Mi történik azonban, ha egy autonóm teherautó balesetet szenved? Ki a felelős? Ebben a blogban elmélyedünk az autonómia világában, hogy milyen hatással lehet a mobilitási ágazatra, ki a felelős, ha baleset történik, és mit gondolnak a járművezetők a változásról.

Melyek az automatizálás különböző szintjei?

A vezetés automatizálásának hat szintje létezik:

    1. szint - Nincs automatizálás. Az ember végzi az összes vezetési feladatot.
    1. szint - Vezetőasszisztens. A jármű egyetlen automatizált rendszerrel rendelkezik.
    1. szint - Részleges automatizálás. A jármű képes kormányozni és gyorsítani. Az ember azonban továbbra is felügyeli az összes feladatot, és bármikor átveheti az irányítást.
    1. szint - Feltételes automatizálás. A jármű képes a legtöbb vezetési feladatot elvégezni. Az emberi beavatkozásra azonban továbbra is szükség van.
    1. szint - Magas szintű automatizálás. Geofencing szükséges, és a jármű bizonyos körülmények között minden vezetési feladatot el tud végezni. Az emberi felülbírálat lehetőség.
    1. szint - Teljes automatizálás. A jármű minden körülmények között elvégzi az összes vezetési feladatot. Nincs szükség emberi figyelemre vagy beavatkozásra.

Hogyan működnek az autonóm teherautók?

Az érzékelők, kamerák és a mesterséges intelligencia lehetővé teszik az autonóm teherautók önálló vezetését. A fejlett programok emberi sofőrök helyett hoznak döntéseket.

Az iparágat érintő problémák

  • Jogszabályok - Ki a felelős, ha baleset történik? A járművezető, a munkáltatója vagy a karbantartó cég? Az alábbiakban ezt vizsgáljuk meg.

  • Infrastruktúra - Meglévő útjainkat a benzinmotorok világára építették. Ezért az infrastruktúrát korszerűsíteni vagy lecserélni kell az önvezető járműparkok támogatásához, amihez pénzre és jelentős politikai akaratra van szükség.

  • Társadalmi változások - A közvélemény hozzáállásában is változásra van szükség. A mesterséges intelligenciával működő járművek sokakat elrettentőnek tűnnek, mivel a biztonsággal, az utazás nyomon követésével és a közúti balesetekkel kapcsolatos jogi szürke zónákkal kapcsolatos aggályok merülnek fel.

  • Biztonság - A digitális hálózatokra támaszkodó rendszer sebezhetőbbé válik a kiberfenyegetésekkel szemben.

Mit gondolnak a teherautó-vezetők az autonóm teherautókról?

Az autonóm teherautók biztonsága forró vitatéma az ágazaton belül, sokan vitatják, hogy a technológia megbízható színvonalon képes-e megbirkózni a kiszámíthatatlan időjárással és felismerni az akadályokat - ami a SNAP közösségi médiaoldalain a teherautó-vezetőket aggasztja:

"A legkisebb esőben a teherautóm elveszíti az összes automata képességét, az AEBS-t és a sebességtartó automatikát. Kizárt, hogy a teherautók a közeljövőben vezető nélkül vezethessék magukat."

"Ez több embert fog megölni az utakon, és még több sorban állást fog okozni. Gondoljon csak arra, hogy mennyire megbízható az elektronika az Euro 6-os járművében. Ugyanazok az emberek készítenek autonóm teherautókat."

Jogszabályok - ki a felelős, ha baleset történik?

Baleset esetén a felelősség eltolódhat a járművezető és a gyártó között. A bíróságnak kell megállapítania, hogy a balesetet műszaki hiba, nem megfelelő karbantartás vagy a járművezető hibája okozta.

Gyártói felelősség

A gyártó a következő esetekben válik felelőssé: - Az érzékelő meghibásodása

  • Szoftverhibák

  • Nem megfelelő kiberbiztonsági intézkedések

  • Nem megfelelő tesztelés

Gépkocsivezető/flotta felelősség

Az autonóm tehergépkocsi vezetője felelősséggel tartozhat egy balesetért, ha elhanyagolja a jármű megfelelő működéséhez szükséges szervizelést vagy karbantartást - lehet azzal érvelni, hogy ez a felelősség a flottakezelőket is terheli.

Ennek ellenére a mobilitási ágazatban dolgozók körében még mindig van némi zűrzavar. A [közösségi médiaoldalainkon] (https://www.facebook.com/snapaccount?locale=en_GB) megkérdeztük a teherautó-vezetőket, hogy szerintük ki lenne felelős egy autonóm járművel való baleset esetén. A sofőrök 51%-a gondolta úgy, hogy a sofőr lenne a felelős, 37% az automatizált teherautók gyártóit, 12% pedig a szoftverfejlesztőket.

Nyilvánvaló, hogy az ágazatban dolgozóknak még több tisztázásra van szükségük, mielőtt az autonóm teherautók állandó jelleggel megjelennek az utakon.

Hogyan néz ki a jövő?

A SNAP az újragondolt [TruckPark of the Future] (https://snapacc.com/truckpark-2049/) kampányában a mobilitási ágazat jövőjét vizsgálja. A technológia fejlődésével az autonóm járművek jelentős szerepet fognak játszani az iparágban, és 50%-os esély van arra, hogy a következő 120 évben a gépek átveszik az összes emberi munkát.

Hogyan fognak azonban megbirkózni Európa néhány legveszélyesebb autópályájával?

A teherautó-vezetés több, mint a volán mögött ülni - gyakran a folyamatosan változó és kiszámíthatatlan útviszonyok között kell navigálni. Felmerül a kérdés, hogy az autonóm teherautók képesek lennének-e megbirkózni Európa néhány legrosszabb útjával. Legutóbbi, [Hazardous Highways] (https://snapacc.com/hazardous-highways/) című kampányukból a SNAP azonosította Európa legveszélyesebb útjait, és az eredmények szerint Bulgária, Litvánia és Csehország a legaggasztóbb.

Azzal lehet érvelni, hogy az autonóm teherautóknak kihívásokkal kell szembenézniük, amikor emberi beavatkozás nélkül próbálnak meg navigálni ezeken az utakon. A korlátozott GPS-pontosság, az érzékelők interferenciája és a következetes infrastruktúra hiánya bonyolíthatja a dolgokat.

Megosztás a

Mások is olvasnak...

Header Image

szerda 18 június 2025 • Hírek és frissítések

ÚJRA MEGNYITJÁK A LENGYEL-UKRÁN HATÁRT: MIT KELL TUDNIUK A FLOTTAÜZEMELTETŐKNEK

Guest

After months of disruption, freight traffic between Poland and Ukraine is moving freely again. But with tensions still simmering and the threat of renewed blockades on everyone’s minds, fleet operators must remain alert to the risks – and prepared to protect driver welfare on both sides of the border.This article explains what caused the disruption, how it affected drivers, and the steps you can take to reduce the impact if industrial action returns.The situation began in late 2023 when Polish truck drivers began protesting at major border crossings. They claimed that the EU’s decision to waive permit requirements for Ukrainian hauliers – introduced as a temporary wartime measure – led to an influx of lower-cost operators undercutting Polish firms.The protests escalated, blocking key freight routes into Ukraine and trapping thousands of vehicles in queues stretching for miles. At its peak, the blockade left at the border, some waiting more than a week to cross. Non-Ukrainian EU drivers, too, suffered long delays, strained schedules and poor conditions. What began as a logistical dispute evolved into a broader protest by Polish truckers over Ukrainian imports, market access, and the impact of emergency EU transport measures. Polish farmers soon joined in, frustrated by the effect of Ukrainian agricultural products on domestic prices.Polish drivers also for border crossings – known as eCherha – arguing that it put EU hauliers at a disadvantage. While the system was designed to streamline freight movement by allowing carriers to pre-book crossing slots, Polish operators claimed it gave Ukrainian firms greater flexibility and faster access. Issues such as language barriers, limited integration with EU logistics systems and inconsistent implementation left many EU drivers waiting longer at the border, further fuelling the perception of unfair treatment and contributing to the broader unrest. Protests begin at Dorohusk, Hrebenne and Korczowa crossings. More crossings are blocked, including Medyka; three Ukrainian drivers die waiting in queues. The Polish government comes to an agreement to pause the blockade until March. Sporadic blockades resume at smaller crossings. A new four-month blockade began at Yahodyn-Dorohusk but was overturned in court. All major border crossings remain open, but the risk of future disruption remains.In response to the disruption and its wider implications, the Polish government has taken a proactive stance. Border crossings with Ukraine have been designated as critical infrastructure, giving them greater protection from future blockades and helping to ensure the continued flow of freight, humanitarian aid and military support. A new Council for Cooperation with Ukraine has also been established to generally strengthen ties between the two countries. Part of its remit is to improve coordination across trade and transportation. In parallel, Poland is investing in eastern border infrastructure and engaging with EU officials to press for fairer terms for Polish hauliers. While these actions may not resolve the situation overnight, they signal a longer-term commitment to stability and structured dialogue.The blockade created unacceptable conditions for professional drivers. Many spent days or weeks in their cabs with no access to toilets, food or running water. Some were stuck in freezing temperatures with no heating or shelter. during the blockade period, with exhaustion and untreated medical conditions believed to be contributing factors. The disruption also caused significant mental and emotional strain, particularly for Ukrainian drivers trying to reach or return from home during wartime. Delays affected not only trade but also the movement of fuel, aid and military goods critical to Ukraine’s national defence.While Polish protesters insisted that humanitarian and military aid vehicles were permitted through the border, indicate that this wasn’t always the case.These conditions weren’t just traumatic for drivers – they also exposed gaps in fleet risk management and emergency planning. Operators must now treat border disruption as an ongoing threat.Although the situation has stabilised, underlying tensions between Polish hauliers, Ukrainian operators and EU policy remain unresolved. Fleet managers operating in or near the region should be alert to the possibility of further industrial action – especially during seasonal pressure points or EU policy reviews.Here are the SNAP team’s recommendations for managing the situation effectively:Stay up-to-date with news from Polish and Ukrainian logistics associations and government sources. Subscribe to border traffic alerts and follow trusted logistics partners for real-time updates.Have contingency plans that redirect vehicles through Hungary, Slovakia or Romania if crossings between Poland and Ukraine become blocked again.Ensure your trucks are stocked with essentials: food, water, power banks and medical kits. During periods of unrest, access to secure truck parking in Poland is essential, so that your drivers are safe, rested and off the roadside. Equip drivers with up-to-date information on secure truck parking and rest areas along their route.Our has an interactive map of truck parking, with 11,000 HGV service providers across Europe, including Poland, Hungary and Slovakia. It’s an easy-to-use tool for finding secure truck rest areas in Poland, making it especially valuable during periods of industrial action. Although the app does not currently offer bookable truck parking in Ukraine, Ukrainian operators and drivers can use intruck to locate reliable rest stops within the EU during long-distance journeys or times of disruption.With increased demand during periods of disruption, advanced booking is critical. Drivers can also use intruck to find and book trusted truck parking in Poland in advance. Whether your vehicles are travelling deep into Eastern Europe or returning westward, it allows your drivers to access parking for trucks near Warsaw and other high-traffic areas.Establish check-in schedules, especially if long waits or diversions are expected. Reassure drivers that their wellbeing is a priority and provide support if they face unexpected delays. If possible, suggest secure lorry parking locations in Ukraine in advance, so they know where to take a break.The reopening of the Poland-Ukraine border is welcome news for fleets operating in Eastern Europe. But with political tensions unresolved, it’s essential to stay prepared.“The situation is rapidly changing,” says Nick Renton, Head of European Strategy and Business Development at SNAP. “With the potential for further disruption at the Poland-Ukraine border, we recommend that fleet operators put robust plans in place to prioritise driver wellbeing and minimise operational risks. That includes building flexibility into delivery schedules, providing essential supplies in vehicles and ensuring drivers have access to secure truck parking. “Our network of bookable truck stops across Europe and Poland gives you the tools to stay agile – offering peace of mind to both operators and drivers when conditions on the ground become unpredictable.”View our interactive map of .

Header Image

szerda 04 június 2025 • Hírek és frissítések

A 2025-ÖS IBÉRIAI-FÉLSZIGETI ÁRAMSZÜNET HATÁSA A KÖZÚTI ÁRUFUVAROZÁSRA

Guest

On 28 April 2025, a widespread power outage swept across the Iberian Peninsula, leaving millions of homes, businesses and public services in Spain and Portugal without electricity. The Spain-Portugal blackout, which began at 12:33pm local time, affected major cities including Madrid, Barcelona, Lisbon and Porto, as well as large parts of the surrounding regions. In some areas, power returned within four to six hours; in others, the disruption lasted well into the following morning.Although the precise cause is still under investigation, early reports suggest a failure in the cross-border transmission network disrupted electricity flow across both national grids. The impact was swift and widespread, halting train services, grounding aircraft, affecting hospitals and public services and paralysing digital infrastructure. For the transport and logistics sector, the challenge was immediate, touching every aspect of road-based operations, from freight and fuel supply to traffic control and driver welfare.“When power fails, so do many of the systems we rely on to keep roads safe – from traffic lights and signage to communications,” says Raquel Martinez, European Sales Manager at SNAP. “For both drivers and fleet operators, the 2025 blackout highlighted just how quickly routine journeys can become high-risk and how important it is to be aware of where drivers can stop to maintain the security of themselves and their loads.”For transport firms, the first and most pressing issue was the suspension of freight movement. Across the Iberian Peninsula, operations at warehouses, fulfilment centres and cross-docking hubs slowed or stopped entirely. International movements were also affected, with trucks held at borders as authorities worked to restore basic traffic control and ensure road safety.With rail freight at a standstill, some operators attempted to shift loads onto the road network, but this brought its own limitations. Congested routes, inoperative traffic systems and patchy fuel access meant that road transport couldn’t absorb the demand. It took several days to clear the backlog and restore supply chain reliability.The Iberian power cuts also revealed the extent to which modern infrastructure depends on digital systems. Traffic lights in major cities went dark, causing congestion and increasing the risk of accidents. Electronic signage, motorway sensors and smart routing systems all failed, depriving drivers of real-time guidance and updates.Toll booths were similarly affected. With automatic barriers and electronic payment systems out of action, staff in some areas had to lift gates manually or collect cash. This led to delays on major routes, lost revenue for toll operators, and concerns about system integrity once power was restored.One of the clearest signs of the sector’s reliance on electricity came at the fuel pumps. As power failed, petrol stations across Spain and Portugal were forced to close. Pumps and payment systems stopped working, leaving only a small number of forecourts with emergency generators able to serve customers. These were quickly overwhelmed, leading to long queues and, in many cases, drivers stranded without fuel.The disruption also extended upstream, with port facilities and fuel distribution networks unable to operate at normal capacity, delaying the movement of fuel to inland areas and further compounding supply issues.For operators of electric vehicles, the outage posed a particular challenge. EV charging across Spain and Portugal were out of service, rendering EVs unusable unless they already had enough charge to complete their route. With no access to recharging, some deliveries were suspended and electric vehicles temporarily taken off the road.For logistics businesses considering the transition to electric fleets, the Iberian power cuts underlined the importance of contingency planning and backup infrastructure to maintain operations during grid failures.Perhaps the most pressing concerns centred around driver welfare. Rest areas and service stations were plunged into darkness – many without lighting, heating, hot food or functioning toilets. Some drivers were left without a safe or secure place to rest during enforced delays.Communication was another major issue. With mobile networks disrupted, drivers struggled to contact depots, request support or access traffic updates. For many, local radio became the only reliable source of information. The situation served as a stark reminder of how exposed the industry can be when critical infrastructure fails.Although the Spain-Portugal blackout lasted less than 24 hours in most places, the disruption to road transport and haulage was significant. The power outage effects on logistics covered everything from fuel supply and infrastructure resilience to emergency preparedness and driver wellbeing. However, it also prompted renewed discussion around how fleet operators can improve business continuity and safeguard their people in the face of similar events.Establishing and testing a robust business continuity plan is an important first step. This should cover communications protocols, fuel access, routing alternatives and vehicle deployment. Where possible, alternative schedules and delivery partners should be identified in advance – particularly for time-sensitive or critical loads.Supporting driver wellbeing is crucial in situations like this. Emergency kits – containing snacks, water, torches, power banks and reflective clothing – can offer reassurance and practical help. “Operators may also wish to review facilities at depots to ensure drivers have safe places to rest, especially during longer delays,” says Raquel. “Knowing that there is a network of truck stops in the region, such as our partner network, can provide reassurance that there is somewhere to stop until the power returns. “Blackouts of this scale may be rare, but the risk is real. Operators must consider how they build resilience and adapt to situations to keep moving – from securing fuel access to re-evaluating route planning and rest provision during emergencies.”We have an extensive network of truck stops and service areas across Spain and Europe.

Header Image

szerda 16 április 2025 • Hírek és frissítések

MILYEN KÖVETKEZMÉNYEKKEL JÁRNAK A 20 MÉRFÖLD/ÓRÁS SEBESSÉGKORLÁTOZÁSOK A FLOTTÁK SZÁMÁRA?

Susie Jones

In 2023, HGVs were involved in collisions that resulted in fatalities, a decline from 2022 but a concerning statistic nonetheless. These accidents could have resulted from several factors, such as driver fatigue, poor vehicle maintenance, weather conditions, or the actions of other road users. However, data from road safety charity Brake suggests that of road-related deaths had speed reported as a road safety factor. In this blog, we'll explore how the implementation of 20mph speed limits could impact fleet operations and lower fatality numbers. According to , only 10% of HGV collisions occurred on a motorway the other 90% were more likely to happen on an urban or rural road. Rural roads present truck drivers with narrow spaces, sharp turns, and interactions with vulnerable road users like cyclists and pedestrians, increasing the likelihood of accidents. Urban areas pose a greater risk for truck drivers due to higher-density traffic, frequent stops, pedestrian activity, and complex road layouts combined with the unpredictability of urban roads makes them more of a hazard for truck drivers. Figures published by the have shown 100 fewer casualties on urban roads in 2024 compared to the same period in 2023 before the 20mph speed limit was enforced in urban areas.The scheme is supported by organisations such as Brake and Cycling UK, and now fleet management specialists are encouraging haulage companies to get behind the scheme. They argue that the shift from 30mph to 20mph will have minimal impact on fleet efficiency and strongly reinforce the idea that it would save lives each year. According to FleetCheck, haulage operators had mixed feelings towards the initiative. Some saw the changes as a hindrance to efficiency arguing that lower speed limits may force some fleets into reducing the number of deliveries they can make in any given period. Drivers on SNAP's social media pages had strong feelings toward the suggestion. One driver commented:"Who is going to back more 20mph zones? The whole standard of driving is the problem. Ever since we came out of lockdown, the standard of driving has been diabolical, that's including cars, vans, and trucks."The sentiment remained the same on socials, with many not supporting the change. Reduced speed zones offer several benefits for truck drivers. • Lower speeds improve reaction times and reduce stopping distances, making it easier to avoid collisions particularly in urban areas.• Trucks are more likely to have less vehicle wear and tear with reduced speed limits. As mentioned, some fleet companies are concerned that lower speed limits could reduce the number of deliveries they could make in any given period. Fleets could also face the following challenges:• affecting time-sensitive deliveries, impacting scheduling and customer expectations.• companies may have to adjust routes to account for slower speeds.• investing in additional driver training to ensure compliance with new speed limits will be crucial. Although these issues can pose additional challenges for fleet companies, many can be managed proactively. Many would argue the long-term safety benefits outweigh the obstacles. In a revisited campaign titled , SNAP identified the most hazardous GB locations. We delve deeper to discover which roads could benefit from a reduced speed limit. SNAP discovered the South East had the most hazardous roads. Kent has the most dangerous roads in Britain and is on the Kent Highway Network by 2050. Which roads are the most concerning?• A short road running for just four miles but was named Britain's highest-risk route in 2018. The report singled out a stretch of the A254 between the junction of the A28 at Margate and the junction with the A255 near Ramsgate. The speed limit on this stretch varies between 30mph and 40mph built-up areas and a heavy traffic flow from the port of Dover make this road particularly dangerous for cyclists, pedestrians, and other road users. Could this stretch of road benefit from slower speed limits?• Notorious for its high accident rates, the A252 runs for 8.7 miles. In 2020, work commenced to reduce the number and severity of accidents, among the changes, a decrease from 60mph to 50mph on this stretch, except where lower limits are in force. However, is this enough to shake off the road's reputation as one of Britain's worst?Surrey and Essex were also at the top of the list and had a combined total of accidents over the last five years. High accident rates in Surrey can be attributed to its mix of populated towns and rural roads. Its closeness to London and major motorways has resulted in more collisions.• Also known as the London Orbital Motorway, the M25 is one of Britain's busiest roads while also being the second-longest ring road in Europe. Between 2007 and 2016, 7,673 accidents and 80 fatalities were reported. As a crucial motorway, speed adjustments as low as 20mph would be ludicrous. However, would the M25 benefit from restricted speed zones?• Running for 67 miles, the A3 can be a challenging road to drive on due to its high traffic volume, speed limits, and sections with poor road conditions. Truck drivers must adhere to strict speed regulations. These restrictions are in place to account for the size, weight, and braking capacity of a truck. • A truck over 7.5 tonnes is limited to a maximum speed of 50mph.• 60mph is the maximum speed limit for a truck over 7.5 tonnes. • Truck drivers must not exceed 60mph on a motorway. In the UK, speed limiter devices must be installed into any truck to cap the maximum speed the vehicle can travel. • All trucks over 3.5 tonnes must have a speed limiter set to 56 mph. • Speed limiters limit the fuel supplied to the engine once the vehicle reaches a preset speed ensuring drivers cannot exceed the limit.A private truck does not require a speed limiter unless it is being used for commercial purposes. You must declare if your vehicle is exempt from needing a speed limiter when you take it for its MOT by filling in a